by Lukas on 25 Sep 2026

Get Real about Reddit: Lessons from Rachel Duffy (The Times)

Rachel Duffy discussing Reddit strategy in a webinar for Standing on Giants

What a major newsroom’s Reddit strategist can teach any brand about showing up on the platform properly.


Table of Contents

The Reddit opportunity

Most social platforms reward performance.

People post the version of themselves they’d like you to see, brands post the version of themselves they’d like you to believe, and everyone quietly agrees not to mention the gap.

Reddit doesn’t work like that. Pseudonymity, upvotes and communities built around a subject rather than a personality add up to something you won’t find anywhere else: people talking to each other as if no one else is listening.

For publishers, that opportunity looks a little different to product brands. It’s not about selling something, it’s about reaching readers who simply aren’t on the platforms you’re used to fighting for attention on.

In this guide, we draw on a conversation with Rachel Duffy, Head of Community at The Times and Sunday Times, who’s spent several years building and growing editorial Reddit strategy, first at the Telegraph and now at The Times.

A view from inside the newsroom

Reddit doesn’t win people over immediately. A lot of the hesitation comes down to unfamiliarity: the jargon, the rules, and the anonymity that makes the platform feel opaque from the outside.

I think I was suspicious purely from a point of ignorance that I had absolutely no idea what was involved in the platform, or why people would use it. It felt quite abstract. There was a lot of jargon, a lot of rules. It wasn’t as simple as other platforms, and it also had a lot more anonymous users, which kind of concerned me.
Rachel Duffy
Head of Community, The Times and Sunday Times

That changes once the platform is used properly rather than observed from a distance. Editorial Reddit strategy at the Telegraph, taken over and grown during the 2024 US presidential election after being set up by the paper’s deputy head of social, is where that shift happened in practice.

The Times have done a lot of reporting around women’s health, for example, being spoken about in such an honest way. Realising the opportunity cost of the platform certainly made it a lot more appealing. And then once I started posting on there, and really understanding the intricacies, and finding my communities, it became a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Rachel Duffy
Head of Community, The Times and Sunday Times

The core insight behind that strategy: Reddit rewards being first, not being biggest.

Reddit really rewards speed and efficiency over potentially the longest story. If a British publisher broke that story first, that would be the one that does best on the platform. It wouldn’t be the one that came from the US publisher, because it’s all about getting that source of information to the users and the communities that are actively engaged, political junkies first. That’s really, really important.”
Rachel Duffy
Head of Community, The Times and Sunday Times

10 lessons about Reddit from Rachel Duffy

Reddit doesn’t reward frequency. A couple of months spent watching, without posting, is worth more than an early flurry of activity. That means looking at how competitors or similar brands are already showing up, understanding the norms of the relevant subreddits, and holding off on posting until the platform’s nuances are properly understood. Consistent monitoring over time builds far more credibility than a high volume of early posts.

A simple way to structure that watching period: a traffic light system across relevant subreddits. Red for ones you can’t post in, amber for ones where the moderator relationship needs work but is possible with the right approach, and green for ones where the relationship is already strong enough to post as a matter of course.

Reddit’s communities are run by unpaid volunteers who care deeply about what they’ve built. Treating moderators as an obstacle to get past, rather than a stakeholder to work with, is a common and costly mistake. Moderators aren’t a barrier standing between a brand and its audience, they’re the people most invested in protecting that audience, and demonstrating genuine care for the community goes a long way.

The approach that works is leading with relevance, not a pitch. Rather than trying to sell a product or service directly, the more effective route is explaining why the content would genuinely benefit the people already in that community.

Reddit runs on anonymity for its users, but the opposite applies to brands and publishers. Disclosure and a real name build far more trust than an anonymous or corporate account ever will. Introducing yourself by name, being upfront about who you work for, and being transparent about self-promotion rules earns far more goodwill than posting anonymously or hiding behind a brand account.

Mixing the two is one of the more damaging mistakes to make on the platform. Subreddits have removed entire accounts belonging to people who shared work-related content from a personal profile without disclosing the connection. If work does get shared from a personal account, disclosing the connection directly in the post is the safer route.

Reddit’s audience overlaps far less with other platforms than most people assume, which makes it a genuine source of new reach rather than a repeat of the same audience on another channel. Estimates suggest that anywhere between thirty and seventy percent of people on Reddit aren’t active on any other major social platform, with very little crossover between Reddit, Instagram, and LinkedIn in particular.

It’s also an audience that arrives already interested in the topic at hand, rather than scrolling past it. Content posted into a relevant subreddit reaches people who already have a vested interest in that subject, unlike a platform where a post has to compete for attention from a cold audience.

Reddit’s anonymity is also where criticism and misinformation about a brand spread fastest. The most effective response is engaging directly, not retreating. When a conversation involving genuine misinformation about a brand gains traction, having a real person show up, using their name, and answering questions without getting defensive tends to shift the tone of the whole discussion.

The framing matters as much as the content. Acknowledging that the conversation is valuable, rather than treating it as a threat to manage, changes how it’s received. That’s a different instinct to the traditional marketing approach of staying quiet and letting negative attention pass.

An AMA (Ask Me Anything) works best with a clear lead time. Three to four weeks is enough to line up the right person, get sign off, and coordinate with moderators on timing.

The details around it matter as much as the session itself: posting proof twenty four hours before it goes live so moderators can pin it and users can leave questions in advance, and following up with moderators afterwards with thanks and relevant updates, rather than disappearing once the session ends.

A recognisable spokesperson isn’t a requirement. What matters is that whoever answers genuinely knows the subject. Even smaller organisations have people whose expertise or day-to-day experience would be genuinely useful to a community, and the time investment involved, coordinating schedules and a handful of messages, is usually small relative to the payoff.

Reddit content already feeds into how AI tools answer questions about a brand, whether or not that brand is actively engaging on the platform. As more people turn to tools like Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini instead of traditional search, being aware of how a brand is already represented in those answers matters, even without an active Reddit presence. Exactly how that relationship develops from here is still an open question, even for people working closely with the platform.

The realistic downside of getting something wrong on Reddit is limited, and usually recoverable. A subreddit ban or a negative comment is not dissimilar to the kind of setback that happens on any social platform, and most situations like that can be discussed and resolved with the relevant moderators rather than treated as a lasting failure.

So, where can you start?

Spend a couple of months just watching. Understand who’s already posting about your category, and how, before you post anything yourself.

Build a traffic light view of relevant subreddits. Where you’re welcome, where the relationship needs work, and where you shouldn’t post at all.

Go to the moderators before you post anything promotional. Introduce yourself by name, explain your connection to the brand, and lead with relevance rather than a pitch.

Keep personal and professional Reddit activity clearly separate. If you do cross over, disclose it in the post itself.

Plan an AMA three to four weeks out. Line up who’s answering, get sign off, message the moderators, and follow up with aftercare once it’s done.

Check how your brand is already showing up in AI answers. Whether or not you’re active on Reddit, it’s likely already shaping how LLMs describe you.

Questions you might be asking yourself

Want to see how another brand approaches Reddit? Read our case study on how Sonos built one of the platform’s most recognised brand presences, with Keith Nieves, Head Global of Communities at Sonos: Get Real about Reddit: Lessons from Sonos

Ready to figure out Reddit?

Thinking about Reddit but not sure where to start? Let’s figure it out together.