We find, foster, and manage the conversations that build community and convert them into business value.
Outsourced community management that lets you scale. Multilingual community experts for forums, Discord, and Reddit.
Human, expert, multi-lingual social media community management built to create connection at scale. Community magic for social channels.
Build a safe, scalable Reddit strategy. Harness customer voice, engage authentically, and boost AI/LLM visibility.
Design, launch, or relaunch a community your business can rely on, with expert community strategy and consulting services.
Expert-led guidance and training to build skills community teams need to thrive.
Design and run programs that turn engaged members into advocates, creators and local leaders.
Turn your community into an always-on, human powered focus group.
Select and setup the right community platform for your business with independent expert help.
Find out more about the Standing on Giants team, our vision and values.
From past to present and everything in between.
Meet the people of Standing on Giants
About employee ownership at Standing on Giants
See our current vacancies and learn about our culture.
A business for people and planet, not just profit
Listen to 'A Little Bit Radical' - our top 40 business podcast!
Search almost any big consumer brand on Reddit and sort by relevance. You will often find something like this.A thread asking whether the company is a scam. A post titled “[Brand] nightmare”. A comment recommending “anything except them”, with a few hundred upvotes agreeing.That page is now doing real work. It ranks in Google, it gets cited by AI assistants when someone asks whether your product is any good, and it is usually the first honest-looking thing a prospective customer reads about you.This is easily the most common reason brands tell us they cannot go near Reddit. The criticism is too loud, too visible and too permanent.Engaging feels like walking into a room where everyone is already talking about you. But that room exists whether you walk into it or not.
Do not try to remove, or suppress them.
Engage a small number of them well, as a named human, with disclosure, in the threads where you can add something nobody else can. Leave the rest alone.
Negative sentiment is not the problem to solve. Unanswered negative sentiment is.
Read the longer version below…
Two things have changed.First, Reddit’s visibility in search has climbed steeply, and LLMs lean on it heavily when answering questions about brands. That is precisely because it reads as unfiltered peer opinion, and upvote weight is one of the strongest signals for what gets surfaced and cited.Second, and more usefully, engagement patterns are shifting.In a recent client listening report covering several hundred threads, we found positive threads drawing almost exactly the same upvote weight as negative ones. That is unusual for Reddit, where negativity has historically travelled much further.Negative threads still generated longer comment trails, because criticism invites debate and praise invites agreement. But the reach was level.The implication is significant. A well-pitched, genuinely helpful contribution can now expect comparable visibility to a complaint.You are not shouting into a headwind. Your Reddit footprint is not fixed, and a more balanced footprint produces a more balanced answer when someone asks an AI about you.
Most brands approach negativity with a moderation mindset. What can we get taken down, hidden, or switched off?On Reddit, that instinct is not just wrong, it is unavailable.You do not (usually) moderate the subreddit. Volunteer moderators do, and they have often cared for that space for years. Asking them to remove criticism of you is the fastest way to burn the one relationship that matters most.Even in communities you do own, suppression is a poor tool. It teaches members that the space is not safe to be honest in, and pushes the conversation somewhere you cannot see it.Community management does something different. It redirects behaviour, educates members and shepherds conduct rather than policing it.You are not trying to eliminate negative posts. You are trying to change what happens next in the thread.Four principles sit underneath that.
As Keith Nieves, who runs Sonos’s Reddit presence as KeithFromSonos, puts it: “Don’t act in service of the brand, be in service of the community member.”He built that credibility long before the app crisis hit, which is exactly why it held during it.
Step back and think about the person on the other side of the screen, who is usually a customer having a bad week rather than an enemy. Nothing on Reddit is so urgent that an hour’s gap makes it worse.
Keith’s framing is that a subreddit is a bar or a cafe, and you are a guest in a space someone else built. You do not go table to table shaking hands. Selectivity reads as respect. Omnipresence reads as monitoring.
Everyone in the thread has an opinion. You have authoritative context: how the product actually works, what the process was, what is changing and when. That is uncontestable, and it is the only real advantage a brand has on Reddit.
“That is not quite how the billing works, here is what actually happens” is a contribution. “We disagree with your characterisation” is a press release. Fix the factually wrong advice being upvoted and leave the feelings alone.
Account-specific problems and guideline breaches are both better handled privately and calmly. In our experience, a measured private message turns behaviour around far more often than a public correction, which mostly just brings an audience to the fight.
Reddit does not accept apologies as a substitute for changes. It does accept changes as a substitute for apologies.
In a space you run, remove only the offending part of a post and tell the author why. Deleting the whole thing makes people feel censored. Trimming it makes them feel corrected. The same goes for moving a thread or changing a title. Always tell the original poster, and always explain.
Some negativity is straightforward. Someone has had a bad experience, they vent, you help or you listen, and they move on.The harder cases are the ones that do not break any rules but still drag the space down. The member who shows up every few weeks with the same complaint. The commenter whose criticism has quietly turned personal.Not quite a violation, but not nothing either.At Standing on Giants we use the REACT framework for these judgement calls. It works whether you are managing your own community or engaging as a guest on Reddit.R, Review the user’s history. Are they always negative, or occasionally frustrated? Have they added value before? Look at tone, timing and patterns. One rough day does not mean bad intentions, though repeated friction might.E, Evaluate the nature of their comments. Is the criticism fair, or has it gone personal? Look for language designed to provoke or undermine rather than to be heard. If a comment crosses the line, escalate internally.A, Assess willingness to accept support. Frustrated members usually engage when help is offered, even a little. People acting in bad faith tend to ignore support, reject it, or vanish until the next flare-up. No engagement is a red flag.C, Consider the time frame. Someone venting once every few months may just need space. The same complaints resurfacing repeatedly despite past help points to something deeper. Frequency and predictability matter.T, Take thoughtful action. If the person seems open, or the issue looks isolated, keep the door open. If the pattern continues, start documenting it. Eventually that may mean a Do Not Engage list, and a decision to protect the wider community instead.And when you are on the fence, ask your team. A second opinion is the cheapest safeguard you have.
You will not measure this in sentiment score movements next month. Reddit is closer to an insurance policy than a campaign. You build the relationship before you need it, and the return shows up when something goes wrong.
Realistic markers of progress:
The goal was never to shut down criticism. It is to keep the space safe for constructive conversation, including constructive criticism of you.
Not every negative comment is a crisis. Not every difficult member is a troll.
And a subreddit full of complaints is not a reason to stay away. It is evidence that people care enough about your product to argue about it.
With a clear process, real context and a team behind you, you will know when to show patience and when to draw the line.
Yes, but selectively. Reply where you can add authoritative context, or correct something factually wrong that is being widely upvoted. Do not reply to every complaint, and do not reply to defend the brand’s reputation, because Reddit reads that instantly and it backfires.
Almost never, and you should not try. Subreddits are run by volunteer moderators, not brands. Requesting the removal of legitimate criticism damages the moderator relationship that underpins any future presence. Removal is only appropriate where content breaks Reddit’s site-wide rules, such as doxxing, harassment or illegality.
Post as a named person with a disclosed brand affiliation rather than as a logo. Write conversationally, be specific, admit what you do not know, and use plain language rather than approved language. Fixing the problem beats framing it well.
REACT is Standing on Giants’ framework for handling grey-area negativity in online communities: Review the user’s history, Evaluate the nature of their comments, Assess willingness to accept support, Consider the time frame, Take thoughtful action.
Listen first. We generally recommend at least three months of listening and moderator relationship-building before any high-visibility engagement such as an AMA. Correcting misinformation can start earlier, once your disclosure approach and escalation routes are agreed.
Yes. Reddit ranks strongly in search and is heavily cited by AI assistants answering questions about brands, with upvote weight a key signal for what gets surfaced. Improving the accuracy of the threads that already rank is usually higher value than trying to create new ones.
