We find, foster, and manage the conversations that build community and convert them into business value.
Outsourced community management that lets you scale. Multilingual community experts for forums, Discord, and Reddit.
Human, expert, multi-lingual social media community management built to create connection at scale. Community magic for social channels.
Build a safe, scalable Reddit strategy. Harness customer voice, engage authentically, and boost AI/LLM visibility.
Design, launch, or relaunch a community your business can rely on, with expert community strategy and consulting services.
Expert-led guidance and training to build skills community teams need to thrive.
Design and run programs that turn engaged members into advocates, creators and local leaders.
Turn your community into an always-on, human powered focus group.
Select and setup the right community platform for your business with independent expert help.
Find out more about the Standing on Giants team, our vision and values.
From past to present and everything in between.
Meet the people of Standing on Giants
About employee ownership at Standing on Giants
See our current vacancies and learn about our culture.
A business for people and planet, not just profit
Listen to 'A Little Bit Radical' - our top 40 business podcast!
Most customer marketing playbooks look the same. Case studies, reference programmes, NPS surveys, the odd webinar, a loyalty scheme, a Slack channel that quietly died six months after launch. All useful. None of it is a growth engine on its own.
Online communities are the piece that’s usually missing. Not a nice-to-have extra. Not a boring forum bolted on to the side of the website. The layer that makes everything else in the playbook compound instead of plateau.
The trouble is most marketers think they already know what a community is, and they’re picturing something far smaller than the real thing. So let’s get real about it. Here are six true stories that show what online communities actually do for the brands that take them seriously.
One wet weekend in 2010, a retired glider pilot spent 16 hours driving up and down the M1 with four mobile phones, four SIM cards, a laptop and an industrial-sized thermos of tea. Nobody paid him. Nobody asked him. He’d decided this was the best way to find a critical fault in a new and struggling mobile network, so he went and did it. He was a member of their community, and to him he wasn’t just a customer, he was part of the story.
That network was giffgaff, the community-led business where Standing on Giants began.
The numbers back up the anecdote. At one point, half of all new customers arrived through referral and member-get-member, and members are 248% more likely to activate a friend than non-members. The result is an NPS of 60, the highest of any UK mobile provider, alongside 98% customer satisfaction, plus over 270 member ideas implemented in the first three years.
There’s an online pub where enthusiasts of Morgan, the quintessentially British heritage motoring brand, gather to share stories and their love of the cars. Nearly a million posts across 50,000 topics: walkthroughs, photos, videos, decades of maintenance know-how passed owner to owner. And none of it is run by the brand they love.
You may think this story is about vintage cars. It’s really about the fact that these people aren’t just customers, they’re custodians, actively preserving a brand and keeping a self-sustaining support network alive that was simply waiting to be found. For a customer marketer, that’s a ready-made asset: a place to celebrate ownership, help customers help themselves, broadcast the best technical advice, and build trusted relationships with thousands of advocates who already show up every day.
Patagonia, the planet-first clothing brand, in place of a loyalty programme, built a pledge and a movement. It gave customers an outlet to drive the kind of change the brand had championed for decades. That shared purpose delivered $140 million to environmental groups across two million customer actions, deepened the brand’s credibility, and drove advocacy through the roof.
You may think this story is about charitable donations. It’s really about building a community around trust and purpose, and how belief delivers more than any product feature or price incentive can. When members trust a brand to point them towards causes they care about, they stop being customers and start being missionaries. It’s a model built on self-selecting around shared values, not products, and it’s exactly the kind of thing other brands spend years trying to replicate.
Nine years ago, Sephora noticed that loyalty schemes only reward a transactional moment, and that customers wanted something more: belonging. So they built the Beauty Insider Community inside the loyalty scheme from the start, to keep customers warm between purchases with daily expert advice, perks, events and promotions. At its peak it was cited everywhere as a brand community done right: 45 million loyalty members, an enormous share of sales flowing through people who felt they belonged.
In 2026, Sephora closed that community. And plenty of people took it as a sign that community was dying. It isn’t. The Beauty Insider conversation didn’t stop, it moved: to Reddit, to Discord, to WhatsApp groups and Instagram, to spaces Sephora no longer owns. The purpose the community served is still very much alive; the platform just changed hands.
You may think this story is about beauty advice, or about a community that failed. It’s really about two lessons every customer marketer should internalise. First, a community built into the thing that drives sales will outperform one built as a separate channel every time. Built in, not bolted on. Second, community is not a platform you own, it’s a behaviour your customers will act out somewhere whether you host it or not. The question is never whether the conversation happens. It’s whether your brand is in the room when it does. (We wrote more on what the Sephora closure really tells us.)
There’s a corner of the internet where people loved Thermomix, a versatile food appliance, so much they built their own 40,000-member Facebook groups to celebrate it and swap recipes. When the brand noticed, it did the smartest thing it could: it made the community official and amplified it, connecting more and more customers to an organic network that now cooks and shares 750,000 meals on the device every single day.
You may think this story is about recipes. It’s really about amplifying, not creating. The community already existed; the brand only had to dial it up. That’s the budget-friendly magic of getting real about community. Connect to the superfans and micro-influencers who already have a following, and you connect to everyone around them, turning a content engine, a recipe pipeline and a word-of-mouth network into one thing at once.
In 2006, Salesforce decided not to build the usual support forum. Instead, it created a tribe called ‘Trailblazers’, a place where customers could grow their careers. Today millions of customers across 90 countries learn from each other, gain insights and accreditation, and develop themselves. Membership has become a sought-after mark of excellence on millions of CVs, and it creates a halo of brand advocacy around the world.
You may think this story is about online learning. It’s really about seeing beyond a support forum and building a community with a genuine purpose for its members, not for the brand’s product roadmap. Name a community around something people actually want to be part of and it stops being a place to troubleshoot issues and becomes a career platform, a live product roadmap, and one of the deepest retention tools a business can own.
None of these communities are marketing campaigns. They’re infrastructure. Once built well, customers do the advocacy, the peer support and the product education for each other, and the customer marketing team shifts from producing every asset to curating and amplifying what the community already generates.
That’s why community belongs in the playbook rather than beside it. It feeds everything else:
The proof that this scales isn’t just in the household names above. When we ran O2’s community over more than a decade of partnership, it generated £3m in annual support deflection savings and 15m annual solution views, with 97% of best answers and 93% of all content coming from members rather than the brand, all at 107% annual member growth. A support function and a marketing asset running almost entirely on peer energy.
The communities that fail almost always fail for the same reason: they’re built as a broadcast channel instead of a place for peers to talk to each other. Members can tell the difference between a space built for them and a space built to sell to them, and they disengage fast from the second one.
The other common failure is ownership. Community gets treated as a side project for whoever has spare time, with no dedicated management, no escalation process, and no clear tie back to retention or expansion metrics. It withers because nobody is actually accountable for whether it’s working.
A community that earns its place in the customer marketing playbook has a few things in common. Dedicated management, not a volunteer effort. A clear connection between engagement and the metrics customer marketing is already judged on: retention, expansion, advocacy volume, time to reference. And a genuine peer-to-peer culture, where the brand shows up to support the conversation rather than dominate it.
Get that right, and community stops being a line item on the budget and starts being the reason the rest of the playbook works better than it used to.
The glider pilot. The Morgan custodians. The 45 million beauty insiders who kept talking even after the doors closed. Every one of them is a real person who cared enough to show up for a brand. The question for every customer marketer is simple: is your community giving them somewhere to do it, and are you there when they do?
Community-led customer marketing puts an online community at the centre of how a brand acquires, retains and grows its customers, rather than treating community as a separate channel or a support forum. Instead of the marketing team producing every asset, customers generate advocacy, peer support and product feedback for each other, and the team curates and amplifies it. It turns a one-off, manual function into always-on infrastructure.
Customers who get help and connection from peers, not just from support tickets, build a relationship with the community itself, not only the product. That gives them a reason to stay that a competitor’s feature list can’t easily replicate. Active communities also surface unhappy customers earlier and give brands a direct line to fix issues before they churn, which is why community engagement so often correlates with higher lifetime value.
No. A support forum exists to deflect tickets. A community can do that too, but the brands that get the most value use it for far more: product development, advocacy, customer intelligence, events and even career development for members. Salesforce’s Trailblazers community, for example, functions as a career platform rather than a troubleshooting queue, which is exactly why it drives such deep loyalty.
Tie community metrics to the outcomes customer marketing is already judged on: support deflection savings, retention and churn rate, expansion revenue, referral and advocacy volume, and time to source a reference. O2’s community, for instance, generated £3m in annual support deflection savings with 97% of best answers coming from members rather than staff. The key is agreeing which business metric the community serves before you launch, not after.
The two most common reasons are treating a community as a broadcast channel instead of a genuine peer-to-peer space, and leaving it without dedicated ownership. Members disengage fast from a space that exists to sell to them, and a community run as a side project by whoever has spare time will wither for lack of accountability. Successful communities have dedicated management and a clear tie back to business metrics.
Often the community already exists. Fan-created Facebook groups and enthusiast forums spring up organically around brands people love, and the smartest move can be to amplify what’s already there rather than build from scratch. When a brand does need its own space, the choice of platform should follow the community strategy, not the other way around.
